Bey

Bey v. Nervis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20204:19-cv-08328California797 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIRK BEY, Case No. 19-cv-08328-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

9 v. JURISDICTION

10 TONIA MARIE NERVIS, 11 Defendant.

12 For the reasons noted below, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES this action for lack of 13 subject matter jurisdiction. 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 On December 20, 2019, Plaintiff Kirk Bey filed a complaint against Defendant Tonia 16 Marie Nervis. Dkt. No. 1 (Compl.) at 3. Plaintiff’s allegations appear to arise from a family law 17 case that is proceeding in California state court between the two parties and certain real property at 18 issue in that case. Id. at 4 (referencing Nervis v. Nervis case, “marriage contract[],” and no longer 19 identifying with “Artificial Entity Kirk Eugene Nervis”). Plaintiff alleges that “as an Aboriginal American Moor,” he has a “birthright entitlement” to property “under [his] Moor Nation Trust,” 20 and that “the State of California and its [sic] subject…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.