Murray

Murray v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20204:20-cv-00471California1,244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICKEY PAUL MURRAY, Case No. 20-cv-00471-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;

GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

9 v. FORMA PAUPERIS

10 J. LOZANO, Re: Dkt. No. 3 11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at California Medical Facility, has filed a pro se 14 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a conviction from 15 Monterey County Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1 at 1. His request to proceed in forma pauperis is 16 GRANTED. Dkt. No. 3 17 BACKGROUND 18 In 2017, petitioner was convicted by a Monterey County jury of possession of a firearm by 19 a felon (Cal. Pen. Code § 29800(a)(1)), possession of ammunition by a felon (Cal. Pen. Code 20 § 30305 (a)(1)), possession of cocaine for sale (Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 11351), possession of 21 heroin for sale (Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 11351), possession of methamphetamine for sale (Cal. 22 Health &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.