SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SC INNOVATIONS, INC., Case No. 18-cv-07440-JCS
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 76 Defendants. 11
12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff SC Innovations, Inc. (“Sidecar”) is a defunct “transportation network company” 14 that offered services matching passengers with drivers for on-demand transportation, also known 15 as “ride-hailing,” through a smartphone app. Sidecar claims that it was driven out of business by 16 Defendants, Uber Technologies, Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Uber”).1 The 17 Court previously dismissed Sidecar’s first amended complaint with leave to amend its Sherman 18 Act claim, and with prejudice as to its claim under California’ Unfair Practices Act. Sidecar filed 19 a second amended complaint, and Uber now moves once again to dismiss. The Court held a 20 public hearing by videoconference on April 24, 2020. For the reasons discussed below,…