Razavi
Razavi v. Target Stores
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 19-cv-07001-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A
v. DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS
TARGET STORES, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant.
13 Pro se plaintiff Melina Razavi filed a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on October 25, 2019. Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. The Court granted Ms. Razavi’s IFP application on November 14, 2019. Dkt. No. 4. Having screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), however, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint otherwise fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Although Ms. Razavi has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, unserved defendant Target Stores (“Target”) has not. Dkt. No. 5. Absent the consent of all parties, this Court does not have jurisdiction to issue dispositive…