Macias

Macias v. KDF Foxdale, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20205:18-cv-07712California2,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

LENA MACIAS,

Case No. 5:18-cv-07712-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT KDF FOXDALE, L.P., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants.

Plaintiff Lena Macias (“Macias”) brought this action against defendants KDF Foxdale, L.P., KDF Communities-Foxdale, LLC (collectively referred to as “KDF”) and VPM Management, Inc. (“VPM” and collectively with KDF, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Federal Fair Housing Act (“FFHA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and various supplemental California laws. Plaintiff now seeks to leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). See Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”), Dkt. No. 38. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.