Macias
Macias v. KDF Foxdale, L.P.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7
LENA MACIAS,
8 Case No. 5:18-cv-07712-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 10 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT KDF FOXDALE, L.P., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants. 12
13 Plaintiff Lena Macias (“Macias”) brought this action against defendants KDF Foxdale, 14 L.P., KDF Communities-Foxdale, LLC (collectively referred to as “KDF”) and VPM 15 Management, Inc. (“VPM” and collectively with KDF, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the 16 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Federal Fair Housing Act (“FFHA”), the 17 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and various supplemental California laws. Plaintiff now seeks to 18 leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 15(a)(2). See Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”), Dkt. No. 38. 20 …