A.O.

A.O. v. Cuccinelli

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20205:19-cv-06151California8,219 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A. O., et al., Case No. 19-cv-06151-SVK

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

9 v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

10 KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs A.O., A.S.R., L.C., R.M., and I.Z.M. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of 13 themselves and all other similarly-situated individuals (the “proposed class”), move for a 14 preliminary injunction against Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 15 (“USCIS”); Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Acting Director of USCIS; Robert M. Cowan, Director of the 16 USCIS National Benefits Center; United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); and 17 Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary of DHS (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. 10. Plaintiffs 18 contend that Defendants adopted a new and unlawful policy (the “reunification authority requirement”) that resulted in the denials of Special Immigrant Juvenile (“SIJ”) petitions. Id. 19 Plaintiffs seek a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.