In re Samsung Galaxy Smartphone Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20205:16-cv-06391California2,317 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 IN RE SAMSUNG GALAXY Case No. 16-cv-06391-BLF

SMARTPHONE MARKETING AND

8 SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

9 REINSTATE ADMINISTRATIVELY

CLOSED CASE AND DEFENDANTS’

10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION

11 [Re: ECF 93, 96] 12 13 This is a putative class action concerning various models of smartphones manufactured by 14 Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The entire suit 15 is currently stayed and the file is administratively closed. Before the Court are two motions: 16 Plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the case and Defendants’ motion to dismiss the case for lack of 17 prosecution. As explained below, the Court will GRANT Plaintiffs’ motion and DENY 18 Defendants’ motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 This case has been stayed since April 13, 2018. ECF 90. Plaintiffs filed the most recent 21 complaint—the First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.