Arias-Maldonado

Arias-Maldonado v. Superior Court, County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20203:19-cv-01328California1,196 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JAIME ARIAS-MALDONADO, Case No. 19-cv-01328-EMC

6 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

7 v. Docket No. 20 8 SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF

SANTA CLARA,

9 Defendant. 10 11 12 Jaime Arias-Maldonado, formerly an inmate at the Santa Clara County Jail, commenced 13 this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by filing a “motion to safeguard civil rights 14 of pretrial detainee,” Docket No. 1, and other miscellaneous documents. 15 The Court conducted an initial screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismissed the 16 pleading with leave to amend. Docket No. 16. The Court explained that Mr. Arias-Maldonado’s 17 several filings were difficult to understand but focused on criminal charges pending against Mr. 18 Arias-Maldonado and appeared to seek federal court authorization to represent himself in state 19 court criminal proceedings and for pro per privileges at the jail. Id. at 2-3. The Court determined 20 that the Younger abstention doctrine required the dismissal of Mr. Arias-Maldonado’s claims 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.