Doe
Doe v. City Of Concord
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-02432-JD
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE IFP APPLICATION AND
9 v. MOTIONS
10 CITY OF CONCORD, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7 Defendants. 11
12 13 Pro se plaintiff Jane Doe has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, as well as 14 motions requesting permission for electronic case filing, appointment of counsel, and to proceed 15 under a pseudonym. 16 The application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, is granted. The Clerk of Court 17 will issue the summons. The U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California will serve, 18 without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments or attachments, and this 19 order on defendants by U.S. mail. 20 Plaintiff requests permission to access the electronic case filing (ECF) system. Dkt. No. 5. 21 Under General Order 72-2, plaintiff may currently access the ECF system without seeking 22 permission. The request is terminated as moot, but must be renewed…