Vande Steeg v. Ford Motor Company

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 ALBERT VANDE STEEG, et al., Case No. 19-CV-05833-LHK

13 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND

14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Albert Vande Steeg and Lucinda Vande Steeg (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring 19 this lawsuit against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Chino Hills Ford (collectively, 20 “Defendants”) for claims arising from Ford’s sale of an allegedly defective vehicle. Before the 21 Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand.1 Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant 22 law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 A. Factual Background 25

26 1 Plaintiffs’ motion to remand contains a notice of motion that was filed and paginated separately from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) 27 provides that the notice of motion and points and authorities should be contained in one…