Vande Steeg v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20205:19-cv-05833California2,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ALBERT VANDE STEEG, et al., Case No. 19-CV-05833-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Albert Vande Steeg and Lucinda Vande Steeg (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Chino Hills Ford (collectively, “Defendants”) for claims arising from Ford’s sale of an allegedly defective vehicle. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand.1 Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background

1 Plaintiffs’ motion to remand contains a notice of motion that was filed and paginated separately from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and points and authorities should be contained in one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.