Ross

Oceana, Inc. v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20203:19-cv-03809California2,921 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OCEANA, INC., Case No. 19-cv-03809-LHK (SVK)

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

10 WILBUR L. ROSS, et al., WITHHELD FROM SECOND

SUPPLEMENTAL

11 Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 12 Re: Dkt. No. 60

13 On April 2, 2020, Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. filed this motion to compel production of ten 14 documents that were withheld from Defendants’ second supplemental administrative record on the 15 basis of the deliberative process privilege. Dkts. 58-1, 60. On April 23, 2020, Defendants filed an 16 opposition indicating that they would release two of the ten documents at issue, bringing the 17 number of documents in dispute to eight. Dkt. 65. Pursuant to this Court’s order setting the 18 briefing schedule (Dkt. 62), Defendants also submitted the disputed documents for possible in- 19 camera review. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.