Ashker
Ashker v. Newsom
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUREKA DIVISION 11 TODD ASHKER, et al., Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI) 12 Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION 13 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
14 GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Judge: Honorable Robert M. Illman Defendants. 16
17 The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the 18 Declaration of Rachel Meeropol in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), 19 Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection 20 under the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm 21 CDCR institutional safety and security if disclosed. See Dugan v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC, No. 12- 22 cv-02549-WHA (NJV), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51162, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013) (finding that 23 good cause may exist to seal records “if disclosure of the…