Capolupo
Capolupo v. Eills
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 CARRIE ANN CAPOLUPO, Case No. 18-cv-07458-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON DEFENDANT
10 v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD
11 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 64
13 14 Now pending before the court is a Motion (dkt. 64) filed by Defendant Humboldt County 15 (“County”) seeking dismissal from Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (dkt. 62). On 16 February 25, 2019, the matter came to be heard at oral argument (dkts. 65, 66), following which 17 Plaintiff was given leave to file a post-hearing brief in opposition (dkt. 67), to which the County 18 has filed a reply brief (dkt. 80). For the reasons stated below, the County’s request for a dismissal 19 is granted in part, denied in part. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff’s claim against the County was previously dismissed with prejudice from the 22 Second Amended Complaint…