Hannan

Hannan v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20204:19-cv-08453California7,966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMI HANNAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08453-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, DISMISS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 20

13 Before the court is defendant Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“Boston Scientific” or “defendant”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND On December 30, 2019, plaintiffs Tami Hannan and Daniel Hannan (“plaintiffs”)1 filed a complaint alleging that one of defendant Boston Scientific’s pelvic mesh products was implanted in Tami Hannan and has since caused her significant pain and other harm. Dkt. 1. On February 25, 2020, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.