Hannan

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 TAMI HANNAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08453-PJH 8 Plaintiffs,

9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

10 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, DISMISS 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 20 12

13 14 Before the court is defendant Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“Boston Scientific” or 15 “defendant”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision 16 without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their 17 arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby 18 rules as follows. 19 BACKGROUND 20 On December 30, 2019, plaintiffs Tami Hannan and Daniel Hannan (“plaintiffs”)1 21 filed a complaint alleging that one of defendant Boston Scientific’s pelvic mesh products 22 was implanted in Tami Hannan and has since caused her significant pain and other 23 harm. Dkt. 1. On February 25, 2020, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)…