Contreras

Contreras v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20204:19-cv-00305California4,723 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

JENNIE Y. CONTRERAS,

7 Case No. 19-cv-00305-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 23 Defendant. 11

12 Plaintiff Jenny Contreras moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the 13 Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found 14 Contreras not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title XVI of the Social 15 Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. For the reasons 16 stated below, the court denies Contreras’s motion and grants the Commissioner’s cross motion. 17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 18 Contreras filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits on June 19 29, 2015, alleging disability beginning on January 31, 2015. Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 84- 20 85, 176-80. The application was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.