Meyberg

Meyberg v. City of Santa Cruz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20205:19-cv-00700California3,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DAVID MEYBERG et al., Case No. 19-cv-00700-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO v. DISMISS 13 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 96, 98 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss. One motion is brought by defendants City of Santa Cruz and various City officials and employees (collectively, “City Defendants”). The other is brought by Ed Guzman, Club Ed, Inc., and Richard Suchomel (collectively, “Club Ed Defendants”). Both groups of defendants seek dismissal of plaintiffs David Meyberg and New Santa Cruz Surf School, LLC’s third amended complaint, alleging an antitrust conspiracy and various constitutional claims. Defendants contend that the City’s municipal ordinance is immune to federal antitrust statutes and Plaintiffs have not identified any constitutional violations. Because Plaintiffs have been unable to state a claim after three attempts, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.