Davis

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 JIMMY LEE DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-03419-PJH 8 Plaintiff,

9 v. ORDER DENYING RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

10 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: Dkt. No. 25 11 Defendant. 12

13 14 On June 10, 2019, pro se plaintiff Jimmy Lee Davis filed a complaint and motion to 15 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkts. 1, 2. On July 3, 2019, Magistrate Judge Spero 16 granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. 5) and on July 10, 2019, issued a report 17 and recommendation finding many of plaintiff’s claims to be delusional and the complaint 18 failed to state a cause of action. Dkt. 6. This court adopted Judge Spero’s report and 19 recommendation on August 13, 2019 and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to 20 amend. Dkt. 15. 21 On August 22, 2019, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, naming the City of San 22 Francisco as the sole defendant. Dkt. 17. On December 13, 2019, the court determined 23 that the claims made in the amended complaint were duplicative of his original complaint…