Davis

Davis v. Breed

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20204:19-cv-03419California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMY LEE DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-03419-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant.

13 On June 10, 2019, pro se plaintiff Jimmy Lee Davis filed a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkts. 1, 2. On July 3, 2019, Magistrate Judge Spero granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. 5) and on July 10, 2019, issued a report and recommendation finding many of plaintiff’s claims to be delusional and the complaint failed to state a cause of action. Dkt. 6. This court adopted Judge Spero’s report and recommendation on August 13, 2019 and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. 15. On August 22, 2019, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, naming the City of San Francisco as the sole defendant. Dkt. 17. On December 13, 2019, the court determined that the claims made in the amended complaint were duplicative of his original complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.