Chamberlin

Chamberlin v. Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20203:19-cv-08243California7,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERLIN, Case No. 19-cv-08243-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

HARTOG, BAER & HAND, APC, et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11, 30

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher Chamberlin, pro se, brings this action against his former attorneys, Defendants Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC (“HBH”) and its three named partners David Baer, John Hartog, and Margaret Hand, asserting claims for fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty and the duty of loyalty, malpractice, and declaratory judgment that his retainer agreement with HBH is void. The thrust of Christopher Chamberlin’s claims is that Defendants failed to disclose a purported conflict of interest with respect to Michael Levin, who is Christopher Chamberlin’s uncle, served as the executor of Christopher Chamberlin’s mother Jane Chamberlin’s estate, and was his adversary in the underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.