Romero

U.S. Bank National Association v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20203:20-cv-00404California415 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Case No. 20-cv-00404-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

9 v. RECOMMENDATION, AND

REMANDING CASE

10 JANETH M. ROMERO, Re: Dkt. No. 5 Defendant. 11

12 This is an unlawful detainer action filed by plaintiff U.S. National Bank Association 13 against defendant Janeth Romero. Romero, representing herself, removed the case from state 14 court. Dkt. No. 1. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler filed a report and recommendation concluding 15 that Romero has “not established federal-question or diversity jurisdiction, and remand to state 16 court thus is appropriate.” Dkt. No. 5. 17 Romero filed an objection on the ground that “this matter brings forth a federal question as 18 to whether a statute, that prohibits Defendant from bringing cross claims to protect her property 19 interest, is constitutional.” Dkt. No. 6 at 3. But as Magistrate Judge Beeler determined, “the 20 ‘well-pleaded complaint’ rule requires a federal question to be presented on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.