Krommenhock

Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20203:16-cv-04958California2,054 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEBBIE KROMMENHOCK, et al., Case No. 16-cv-04958-WHO

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

9 v. RECONSIDERATION; DENYING

MOTION CERTIFICATE OF

10 POST FOODS, LLC, APPEALABLITY; GRANTING

MOTION TO APPOINT ADDITIONAL

11 Defendant. CLASS COUNSEL; RESOLVING

MOTIONS TO SEAL

12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 229, 230, 231, 237 13 14 Currently before me are a number of issues. As explained below, Post’s motions for leave 15 to file a motion for reconsideration and motion for certificate of appealability are DENIED and 16 plaintiffs’ motion to appoint additional class counsel is GRANTED. 17 The parties should meet and confer regarding the class notice and case management 18 schedule in advance of the May 27, 2020 Case Management Conference. The burdens on Post for 19 engaging in that meet and confer and case management process are minimal. If Post seeks Rule 20 23(f) relief from the Ninth Circuit, and if the case is stayed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.