Yu
Yu v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YANBIN YU, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-06181-JD
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE ATTORNEY'S FEES v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 81 10 APPLE INC., Defendant. 11
12 13 Plaintiffs Yanbin Yu and Zhongxuan Zhang (“Yu”) alleged that Apple cell phones with 14 dual-lens cameras infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,611,289 (“’289 patent”). They filed a virtually 15 identical suit against Samsung regarding its devices. See Dkt. No. 61 in Yu v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 16 Case No. 18-cv-06339-JD (N.D. Cal.). The Court dismissed Yu’s original complaints because the 17 ’289 patent was directed to unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and Alice Corp. 18 Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014). Yu v. Apple Inc. (Yu I), 392 F. Supp. 3d 19 1096, 1108 (N.D. Cal. 2019). Yu was granted leave to amend. Id. The amended complaints were 20 dismissed with prejudice, and judgment was entered against plaintiffs. Yu v. Apple Inc. (Yu II), 21 ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2020 WL 1429773, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2020); Dkt. No. 78; Dkt. 22 …