Domino
Domino v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DOMINO, Case No. 19-cv-08449-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SERVE OR TO PROVIDE LOCATION
v. OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 30, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. On January 31, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered the United States Marshal to issue summons and serve the amended complaint upon defendants. See Dkt. No. 12. On May 4, 2020, the United States Marshals Service filed an executed summons, indicating that Jomel Garchitoerta, a manager at the Taco Bell and Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants located at 691 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109, had accepted the summons and service. Dkt. No. 25. However, Mr. Garchitoterta may not accept service on behalf of defendants who are corporate entities. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h). 19 Federal Rule of Civil…