Domino
Domino v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL DOMINO, Case No. 19-cv-08449-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SERVE OR TO PROVIDE LOCATION
9 v. OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS
10 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 30, 2019. 13 Dkt. No. 1. On January 31, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis 14 and ordered the United States Marshal to issue summons and serve the amended complaint upon 15 defendants. See Dkt. No. 12. On May 4, 2020, the United States Marshals Service filed an 16 executed summons, indicating that Jomel Garchitoerta, a manager at the Taco Bell and Kentucky 17 Fried Chicken restaurants located at 691 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109, had accepted the 18 summons and service. Dkt. No. 25. However, Mr. Garchitoterta may not accept service on behalf of defendants who are corporate entities. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h). 19 Federal Rule of Civil…