Housh

Housh v. Rackley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20204:17-cv-04222California344 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLOS C. HOUSH, Case No. 17-cv-04222-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

ASSISTANCE

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 68 10 RONALD RACKLEY, 11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a pro se prisoner, filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 14 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a letter with the Court, alleging that he has been placed in 15 administrative segregation in retaliation for his attempting to amend his petition to add a claim of 16 sentencing error and that prison officials are refusing to release his court mail and legal mail. Dkt. 17 No. 68. Petitioner requests “assistance/court enforcement.” Id. 18 Petitioner’s request for court assistance is DENIED. Dkt. No 68. To the extent that 19 petitioner seeks redress for, or remedy with respect to, the alleged retaliation, the alleged 20 unjustified placement in administrative segregation, and the denial of access to his legal and court 21 mail, these are claims that challenge his conditions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.