Cohen
Cohen v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 ANDREW COHEN, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, No. C 19-05322 WHA
12 v.
13 APPLE, INC., ORDER GRANTING IN PART
MOTION FOR EXTENSION
14 Defendant.
15 16 Plaintiffs move to extend their deadline to respond to Apple’s motion for summary 17 judgment from May 15 to June 15. Apple opposes, only willing to stipulate to a one-week 18 extension. Alternatively, Apple seeks a stay of all discovery pending decision on its motion. 19 The motion raises preemption and jurisdictional issues first presented by Apple’s motion 20 to dismiss. A prior order denied Apple’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to renewal under 21 Rule 56. The vast array of materials presented outside of the pleadings necessitated further 22 discovery into the issues presented. The motion could be renewed after all parties had been 23 given an opportunity to take reasonable discovery into the issues raised by the extraneous 24 material (Dkt. No. 89). 25 Plaintiffs proceeded, serving Apple with its…