Padgett

Padgett v. City of Monte Sereno

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20205:04-cv-03946California1,285 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSEPH PADGETT, et al., 8 Case No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. WRIGHT’S MOTION TO VACATE OR 10 MODIFY BUSTAMANTE’S BRIAN LOVENTHAL, et al., PROPOSED RENEWED JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 1244 g

13 Defendant A. Curtis Wright challenges Joseph Padgett’s (“Padgett”) former attorneys’,

14 || Bustamante & Gagliasso (“Bustamante”), application for and renewal of judgment. Having © 3 15 || considered the Parties’ briefs, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to vacate or modify the A 16 || proposed renewed judgment.'

(«17 I. BACKGROUND

18 In 2004, Padgett sued eight defendants for alleged civil rights violations. After a jury trial, 19 || Padgett received $1 in nominal damages and $200,000 in punitive damages, which the Court 20 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.