Padgett

Padgett v. City of Monte Sereno

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20205:04-cv-03946California1,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSEPH PADGETT, et al., Case No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. WRIGHT’S MOTION TO VACATE OR MODIFY BUSTAMANTE’S BRIAN LOVENTHAL, et al., PROPOSED RENEWED JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 1244 g

Defendant A. Curtis Wright challenges Joseph Padgett’s (“Padgett”) former attorneys’,

|| Bustamante & Gagliasso (“Bustamante”), application for and renewal of judgment. Having © || considered the Parties’ briefs, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to vacate or modify the A 16 || proposed renewed judgment.'

(« I. BACKGROUND

In 2004, Padgett sued eight defendants for alleged civil rights violations. After a jury trial, || Padgett received $1 in nominal damages and $200,000 in punitive damages, which the Court ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.