Perez

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 IGNACIO PEREZ, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-07288-YGR

6 Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

7 vs. DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; (2)

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

8 INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, AND/OR STAY CASE; (3) GRANTING IN

ET. AL., PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

9 STRIKE PORTION OF COMPLAINT AND Defendants. EXHIBITS RE: MEDIATION MATERIALS 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 13, 14 11

12 13 In the related matter, Perez v. Rash Curtis & Associates, No. 16-cv-03396-YGR, (N.D. 14 Cal.) (“Perez I”), a jury verdict was entered that each member of the class shall recover from 15 defendant the amount of $500 per call made in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection 16 Act (“TCPA”), for an aggregate award in favor of the class of over $267 million. (Dkt. No. 347.) 17 On October 25, 2020, the Court approved the October 11, 2019 assignment, which assigned Rash 18 Curtis & Associates’ (“Rash Curtis”) bad faith…