Perez

Perez v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20204:19-cv-07288California7,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 IGNACIO PEREZ, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-07288-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

vs. DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; (2)

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, AND/OR STAY CASE; (3) GRANTING IN

ET. AL., PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

STRIKE PORTION OF COMPLAINT AND Defendants. EXHIBITS RE: MEDIATION MATERIALS 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 13, 14

12 In the related matter, Perez v. Rash Curtis & Associates, No. 16-cv-03396-YGR, (N.D. Cal.) (“Perez I”), a jury verdict was entered that each member of the class shall recover from defendant the amount of $500 per call made in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), for an aggregate award in favor of the class of over $267 million. (Dkt. No. 347.) On October 25, 2020, the Court approved the October 11, 2019 assignment, which assigned Rash Curtis & Associates’ (“Rash Curtis”) bad faith…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.