Calhoun

Calhoun v. Flrish, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20203:19-cv-08212California1,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIA CALHOUN, Case No. 19-cv-08212-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. STAY, MOTION TO QUASH, AND

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

FLRISH, INC., UNDER SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 42,

I. INTRODUCTION Defendant FLRish, Inc. moves to stay this putative class action because the U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari on the question of whether one of the statutory provisions asserted by Plaintiff Gia Calhoun is unconstitutional. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing previously set for May 15, 2020. For the reasons discussed below, FLRish’s motion is GRANTED, and the case is STAYED.2 In light of the stay imposed by this order, non-party Springbig, Inc.’s motion to quash is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff Gia Calhoun’s administrative motion to file under seal is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.