Calhoun
Calhoun v. Flrish, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GIA CALHOUN, Case No. 19-cv-08212-JCS
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
9 v. STAY, MOTION TO QUASH, AND
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
10 FLRISH, INC., UNDER SEAL 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 42, 47
12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Defendant FLRish, Inc. moves to stay this putative class action because the U.S. Supreme 14 Court has granted certiorari on the question of whether one of the statutory provisions asserted by 15 Plaintiff Gia Calhoun is unconstitutional.1 The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution 16 without oral argument and VACATES the hearing previously set for May 15, 2020. For the 17 reasons discussed below, FLRish’s motion is GRANTED, and the case is STAYED.2 18 In light of the stay imposed by this order, non-party Springbig, Inc.’s motion to quash is 19 DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff Gia Calhoun’s administrative motion to file under seal is 20 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 21 …