Wilson

Wilson v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20204:18-cv-06744California397 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7

8

9 ANTHONY ROSIER WILSON, Case No.: 4:18-cv-06744 YGR

10 Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

11 v. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

12 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Re: Dkt. No. 19 13 Respondent.

14 15 16 On June 20, 2018, petitioner Anthony Rosier Wilson petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. No. 2.) On April 3, 2020, the Court granted respondent 18 Robert Neuschmid’s motion to dismiss the habeas petition. (Dkt. No. 16.) On May 1, 2020, Wilson 19 filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit. (Dkt. No. 17.) On May 12, 2020, the Ninth Circuit 20 remanded Wilson's case to this Court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of 21 appealability. (Dkt. No. 19; see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. 22 Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).) 23 The Court DENIES Wilson’s request for a certificate of appealability because Wilson has not 24 made “a substantial showing of the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.