Milliken

Milliken v. Studervant

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20205:18-cv-05326California14,348 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 JAMES M. MILLIKEN, Case No. 18-CV-05326-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

14 v.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

15 C. STURDEVANT,1, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 45 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a California prisoner incarcerated at California State Prison, Sacramento (“CSP- 19 Sac”). Plaintiff was previously incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) and California 20 State Prison, Corcoran (“CSP-Cor”). See Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff filed 21 a pro se civil rights complaint alleging that he had been improperly placed in solitary confinement 22 at PBSP. See id. The Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, see Dkt. No. 6, 23 and plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), see Dkt. No. 9. 24 25 1 This defendant was originally identified as “C. Studervant.” Dkt. No. 1. Subsequent filings 26 reveal that the correct name for this defendant is “C. Sturdevant.” See Dkt. No. 45, Ex.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.