Ellawendy
Ellawendy v. CSUMB Police Department
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABELFATAH ELLAWENDY, Case No. 19-cv-08417-SVK 8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
9 v. RE-FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
10 CSUMB POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 11 Defendants. a 12 On May 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in response to this Court’s
13 || April 10, 2020 screening order. Dkt. 11; Dkt. 12. Plaintiff's amended complaint merely contains 14 || “amendments” to his first amended complaint and does not re-incorporate the allegations the
15 |} Court deemed proper in the April 10, 2020 screening order. See Dkt. 12. “[T]he amended
5 16 || complaint should be a stand-alone document that includes all relevant factual allegations.” Hilton
3 17. || v. Pagani Worldwide LLC, 19-cv-01848-VC, 2019 WL 4729603, at *1 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 2019). 1g || Thus, for his complaint to be proper, Plaintiff may not rely on allegations made in earlier filings; 19 rather, he must restate all…