Mercado

Mercado v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20205:16-cv-04200California1,220 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MARIO ARENAS MERCADO, Case No. 16-cv-04200-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

9 v. AUTHORIZATION OF ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 10 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 [Re: ECF 26] 11 Defendant. 12 13 In this Social Security appeal, the Court granted in part Plaintiff Mario Arenas Mercado’s 14 motion for summary judgment, remanded the case for further agency proceedings, and entered 15 judgment for Plaintiff. See ECF 19, 20. On remand, Plaintiff was awarded past-due disability 16 insurance benefits in the amount of $92,491.60. See LaPorte Affidavit, ECF 26 at 6.2 Plaintiff’s 17 counsel (“Counsel”) has filed an application for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 406(b) and the parties’ contingent-fee agreement, which provides that Plaintiff will pay 19 attorneys’ fees in the amount of 25% of past-due benefits awarded. See Motion, ECF 26. 20 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.