Calderon

Calderon v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20204:19-cv-07949California1,795 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JAVIER CALDERON, Case No. 19-cv-06112-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE; CASE

10 v. MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE;

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

11 C. KOENIG, et al., Defendants. 12

13 14 Pro se plaintiff Javier Calderon filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) in Soledad, 16 where he is currently incarcerated.1 Mr. Calderon’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 17 has been granted. Dkt Nos. 5, 11. 18 I. STANDARD OF REVIEW 19 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 20 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims 22 that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek 23 monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.