Funk

Funk v. Bank of Hawaii

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20205:20-cv-01378California4,588 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 LEIRE FUNK, Case No. 20-CV-01378-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

9 v. REMAND AND REQUEST FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES; TERMINATING

10 BANK OF HAWAI’I, et al., DEFENDANT MTGLQ INVESTORS,

L.P.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11 Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 [Re: ECF 11; 17]

13 14 Plaintiff Leire Funk brings this action against Bank of Hawai’i (“BOH”) and MTGLQ 15 Investors, L.P. (“MTGLQ”) (together “Defendants”) alleging unlawful conduct related to 16 Defendants’ foreclosure of Plaintiff’s real property. Exh. A to Am. Notice of Removal (“Compl.”), 17 ECF 16. On February 24, 2020, BOH removed this action from California state court based on 18 diversity jurisdiction. See ECF 1. On March 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed the present motion for remand 19 on the ground that BOH’s Notice of Removal (at ECF 1) failed to establish: (1) the citizenship of 20 MTGLQ, (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.