Mims
Mims v. AMLI Management Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GIOVANNI MIMS, Case No. 20-cv-01715-WHO
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
9 v. TRANSFER VENUE
10 AMLI MANAGEMENT COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants. 11
12 13 Giovanni Mims brings multiple claims arising out of his employment termination with 14 AMLI Management Company, AMLI Residential Partners, LLC, and AMLI Residential 15 Properties, L.P. (collectively “AMLI”). AMLI removed this lawsuit from Alameda County 16 Superior Court and now moves to transfer it to the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 17 1404(a), for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and the interest of justice and 18 alternatively under the venue provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). 19 Mims did not oppose the motion, and all available information points to the Central District as the 20 appropriate venue for this case. There is no need for a hearing on the issues raised, and so I 21 VACATE the motion hearing scheduled for May 27, 2020. For the…