Linton

Linton v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20203:18-cv-07653California2,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CHAD JAY LINTON et al., Case No. 18-cv-07653-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

XAVIER BECERRA et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants.

11 After filing a first amended complaint, Dkt. No. 36, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction with respect to ownership and possession of firearms, Dkt. No. 38. The motion is denied. BACKGROUND This case began in December 2018, when individual plaintiffs Chad Linton and Paul McKinley, and five non-profit organizations dedicated to firearms advocacy, sued the Attorney General and other officials of the State of California. Dkt. No. 1. The individual plaintiffs allege that they were denied authorization to acquire firearms by the California Department of Justice under a long-standing policy that bars ownership or possession of firearms by convicted offenders. Linton and McKinley acknowledge prior convictions in other states, but say that those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.