Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20205:18-cv-07182California5,256 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NEO4J, INC., et al., 8 Case No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 11 Defendants. 12

13 Before the Court is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Neo4j, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Neo4j 14 USA”) motion for a judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) 15 (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 60. Plaintiff requests judgment on the pleadings as to the First Cause of 16 Action for Cancellation of Trademark and Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief for 17 Abandonment of Trademark asserted in Defendant John Mark Suhy’s (“Suhy”) Counterclaim 18 (Dkt. No. 48), as well as the Tenth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief for Abandonment of 19 Trademark and Eleventh Cause of Action for Cancellation of Trademark asserted in the First 20 Amended Counterclaim filed by Defendants PureThink, LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.