Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20205:18-cv-07182California5,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NEO4J, INC., et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 11 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Neo4j, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Neo4j USA”) motion for a judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 60. Plaintiff requests judgment on the pleadings as to the First Cause of Action for Cancellation of Trademark and Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief for Abandonment of Trademark asserted in Defendant John Mark Suhy’s (“Suhy”) Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 48), as well as the Tenth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief for Abandonment of Trademark and Eleventh Cause of Action for Cancellation of Trademark asserted in the First Amended Counterclaim filed by Defendants PureThink, LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.