Anthony C. Lustig v. AzGen Scientific Holdings PLC

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY C. LUSTIG, Case No. 18-cv-07503-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT

10 AZGEN SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS PLC, Re: Dkt. No. 47, 48 11 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Anthony Lustig (“Lustig”) filed a motion (“Motion”) for entry of default 14 judgment against Defendant AzGen Scientific Holdings PLC (“AzGen”), Dkt. No. 47. Paul Gray 15 and Luis Siemens, directors of AzGen, filed a purported opposition “pro se.”1 (“Opp.,” Dkt. No. 16 53). The Court held a hearing on the motion on January 9, 2020. Dkt. No. 54. On January 16, 17 2020, Plaintiff filed a supplemental memorandum in support of the Motion, as requested by the 18 Court. (“Supp. Mot.,” Dkt. No. 55). Gray and Siemens filed a response to that supplemental memorandum, again purporting to act in a pro se capacity. (“Supp. Reply,” Dkt. No. 57). For the 19 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion. 20 21 …