Romano
Romano v. Unknown Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Agents
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 THOMAS J. ROMANO, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 19-07172 WHA
12 v.
13 UNKNOWN INTERNAL REVENUE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SERVICE (IRS) AGENTS; UNKOWN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
14
FEDERAL BUREAU OF NOTICE OF APPEAL
15 INVESTIGATION (FBI AGENTS;
RICHMOND, CA POLICE
16 DEPARTMENT; UNKOWN RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS; and 17 DOES I to X, inclusive, 18 Defendants.
19 20 Plaintiff moves for a sixty day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Plaintiff relies 21 on FRAP 4(a), which provided plaintiff thirty days from the February 13 entry of judgment to 22 file a notice of appeal. Plaintiff filed his motion by certified mail on April 28, seventy-five 23 days after the entry of judgment. 24 Plaintiff does not acknowledge the untimeliness of his motion or point to an applicable 25 exception. Instead, the motion merely states that an extension is necessary “due to the 26 Coronavirus causing delays and shutdowns in our society.” The requirement of…