Manda

Manda v. Albin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20205:19-cv-01947California7,000 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 AVANTHI MANDA, et al., 9 Case No. 5:19-cv-01947-EJD Plaintiffs, 10 ORDER GRANTING CITY v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 11 DISMISS; GRANTING DEFENDANT CATHERINE ALBIN, et al., ALBIN’S MOTION TO DISMISS 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 53, 58 13

14 This is Plaintiffs’ second attempt to plead facts to support their claims that Defendants 15 unconstitutionally seized Plaintiffs’ minor child A.Y. The First Amended Complaint again names 16 multiple defendants: (1) the “City Defendants” consisting off the City of Sunnyvale, Sunnyvale 17 Police Officers Matthew Meyer, Jesse Ashe, Anthony Serrano, Gregory Giguiere, and ten Doe 18 Defendants (who are also police officers) and (2) Dr. Catherine Albin. First Amended Complaint 19 for Damages (“FAC”), Dkt. 50. Defendant Albin is a medical expert in child abuse and is a 20 pediatrician at Kaiser. Plaintiffs argue that Albin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.