Vieira

Vieira v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20201:18-cv-04960California8,851 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 MANUEL VIEIRA, Case No. 18-cv-04960-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER

10 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 27 11 ANDREW SAUL, 12 Defendant.

13 14 Plaintiff, Manuel Vieira, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) 15 decision denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social 16 Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the 17 Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social 18 Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have 19 consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 6 & 10), and both parties have moved for 20 summary judgment (dkts. 18 & 27). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant Plaintiff’s 21 motion for summary judgment, and will deny Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 22 LEGAL STANDARDS 23 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.