Discord, Inc. v. Discord Sound

Good Law

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20204:19-cv-05824California2,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

LJAeTnnHifAeMr L &. B WarAryT (KBIaNr SN oL.L 2P28066) jennifer.barry@lw.com Patrick C. Justman (Bar No. 281324) patrick.justman@lw.com 12670 High Bluff Drive San Diego, CA 92130 858.523.5400 / 858.523.5450 (Fax) 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DISCORD, INC. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 11 DISCORD, INC., a Delaware corporation, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-05824-HSG 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION v.

DYNAMIC TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.,

DBA DISCORD SOUND, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Discord, Inc. (“Discord”), on the one hand, and Defendant Dynamic Technology Group Ltd., DBA Discord Sound (“Defendant”), on the other hand, stipulate as follows: 1. Discordis the owner of the DISCORD® mark, including U.S. Federal Registration No. 4,930,980. As reflected in this registration, Discord has used the DISCORD® mark since March 2, 2015 with “computer software applications for social networking” and “sending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.