Discord, Inc. v. Discord Sound
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 LJAeTnnHifAeMr L &. B WarAryT (KBIaNr SN oL.L 2P28066) 2 jennifer.barry@lw.com Patrick C. Justman (Bar No. 281324) 3 patrick.justman@lw.com 12670 High Bluff Drive 4 San Diego, CA 92130 858.523.5400 / 858.523.5450 (Fax) 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 DISCORD, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 DISCORD, INC., a Delaware corporation, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-05824-HSG 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND 13 PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. 14
DYNAMIC TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.,
15 DBA DISCORD SOUND, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff Discord, Inc. (“Discord”), on the one hand, and Defendant Dynamic Technology 2 Group Ltd., DBA Discord Sound (“Defendant”), on the other hand, stipulate as follows: 3 1. Discordis the owner of the DISCORD® mark, including U.S. Federal 4 Registration No. 4,930,980. As reflected in this registration, Discord has used the DISCORD® 5 mark since March 2, 2015 with “computer software applications for social networking” and 6 “sending…