Sobaszkiewicz

Sobaszkiewicz v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20204:18-cv-07553California3,595 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 HERMAN OVERPECK, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07553-PJH 8 Plaintiffs,

9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING PART MOTION TO AMEND

10 FEDEX CORPORATION, et al., COMPLAINT 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 110 12

13 14 Before the court is plaintiffs Herman Overpeck, Kevin Sterling, and Shannon 15 Sobaszkiewicz’s (“plaintiffs”) motion to amend complaint. The matter is fully briefed and 16 suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully 17 considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, 18 the court hereby rules as follows. 19 BACKGROUND 20 On December 14, 2018, plaintiffs Overpeck and Sterling filed a putative class 21 action against FedEx Corporation (“FedEx”) and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. 22 (“FedEx Ground” and together with FedEx, “defendants”). Dkt. 1. On January 29, 2020, 23 plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which added…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.