Richter
Richter v. Ausmus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA RICHTER, Case No. 19-cv-08300-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION
LISA AUSMUS, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff Julia Richter filed a motion to alter or amend my March 24, 2020 order dismissing with prejudice her third, fifth, tenth, seventeenth, and twenty-first causes of action. Dkt. No. 31. Richter moves to reconsider the dismissal of her third cause of action. Richter’s motion is DENIED. Although Richter has not identified any arguments that are appropriate pursuant to Rule 59 or 60, I address her arguments below for clarity. In my March 24 order, I dismissed Richter’s third, fifth, tenth, and seventeenth causes of action with prejudice because Richter was not subject to criminal prosecution. See Dkt. No. 28 at 11. However, I noted that Richter could state a claim for other substantive or procedural due process violations. Id. at 8. Richter first argues that dismissal of her…