Richter

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JULIA RICHTER, Case No. 19-cv-08300-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

9 v. RECONSIDERATION

10 LISA AUSMUS, et al., Defendants. 11

12 Plaintiff Julia Richter filed a motion to alter or amend my March 24, 2020 order dismissing 13 with prejudice her third, fifth, tenth, seventeenth, and twenty-first causes of action. Dkt. No. 31. 14 Richter moves to reconsider the dismissal of her third cause of action.1 Richter’s motion is 15 DENIED. Although Richter has not identified any arguments that are appropriate pursuant to 16 Rule 59 or 60, I address her arguments below for clarity. 17 In my March 24 order, I dismissed Richter’s third, fifth, tenth, and seventeenth causes of 18 action with prejudice because Richter was not subject to criminal prosecution. See Dkt. No. 28 at 19 11. However, I noted that Richter could state a claim for other substantive or procedural due 20 process violations. Id. at 8. 21 Richter first argues that dismissal of her…