In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG

LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING ASUS’S REQUEST

FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN This Document Relates To: ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALL ACTIONS

Re: Dkt. No. 971

12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants ASUS Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer Inc.’s (collectively, “ASUS”) request for leave to file an additional motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 971 at 2. ASUS asserts that the Federal Circuit decision in Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Google LLC, 948 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2020), demonstrates that claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,529,806 (the “’806 Patent”) is invalid. Specifically, ASUS argues that in affirming the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) finding that claim 1 of the ’806 Patent is invalid, the Federal Circuit adopted interpretations of claim 12 terms “media presentation” and “identifying,” “determining,”…