Cathy

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES RAY CATHY, Case No. 19-cv-05932-PJH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 21 10 R. KUZMICZ, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983. The court ordered service and defendants filed a waiver of reply on 15 March 17, 2020. On April 27, 2020, plaintiff requested a 90 extension or a stay of the 16 proceedings. Plaintiff noted that he needed additional time to reply to defendants’ 17 discovery requests which was complicated by the current public health crisis. Other than 18 discovery requests, there are no pending motions requiring plaintiff’s attention. 19 Defendants requested an extension and a dispositive motion is now due on July 3, 2020. 20 Defendants have also indicated that plaintiff may have an extension to respond to the 21 discovery requests. Docket No. 19 at 3. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay is denied; however, 22 if plaintiff needs an extension to file an opposition to a dispositive motion once…