In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 19-cv-00325-HSG
IN RE TOY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 417
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s motion to modify the Court’s scheduling order. See Dkt. No. 417. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reason detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Agnes Toy and Thomas H. Toy, Jr. filed this asbestos lawsuit on December 14, 2018, in Alameda Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A. It was later removed to federal court, and on July 22, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint alleging that decedent Thomas Toy was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products over the course of his…