In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Case No. 19-cv-00325-HSG
8 IN RE TOY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
9 MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 10 Re: Dkt. No. 417 11
12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s motion to modify 14 the Court’s scheduling order. See Dkt. No. 417. The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reason detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiffs Agnes Toy and Thomas H. Toy, Jr. filed this asbestos lawsuit on December 14, 19 2018, in Alameda Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A. It was later removed to federal court, 20 and on July 22, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint alleging that decedent Thomas 21 Toy was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products over the course of his…