Chung
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION, STAY THE CASE,
WILSON CHUNG, et al., AND DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 41, 43, 45, 47, 54, 57,
Before the court are defendant Jedd Williams’ (“Williams”) motion to compel arbitration and stay the case or, in the alternative, motion to dismiss (Dkt. 41), defendant Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motions (Dkt. 43), defendant Plantronic Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 40) and joinder to Williams’ and Chung’s motions (Dkt. 47), defendant Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) motion to dismiss and joinder to his co-defendants’ respective motions (Dkt. 45), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. 54) (collectively, “defendants”). Having read…