Chung

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20204:19-cv-07562California16,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION, STAY THE CASE,

WILSON CHUNG, et al., AND DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 41, 43, 45, 47, 54, 57,

Before the court are defendant Jedd Williams’ (“Williams”) motion to compel arbitration and stay the case or, in the alternative, motion to dismiss (Dkt. 41), defendant Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motions (Dkt. 43), defendant Plantronic Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 40) and joinder to Williams’ and Chung’s motions (Dkt. 47), defendant Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) motion to dismiss and joinder to his co-defendants’ respective motions (Dkt. 45), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. 54) (collectively, “defendants”). Having read…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.