Chung

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20204:19-cv-07562California16,464 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

6 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH 7 Plaintiffs,

8 v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION, STAY THE CASE,

9 WILSON CHUNG, et al., AND DISMISS 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 41, 43, 45, 47, 54, 57, 11 80

12 Before the court are defendant Jedd Williams’ (“Williams”) motion to compel 13 arbitration and stay the case or, in the alternative, motion to dismiss (Dkt. 41), defendant 14 Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motions (Dkt. 15 43), defendant Plantronic Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 40) and 16 joinder to Williams’ and Chung’s motions (Dkt. 47), defendant Thomas Puorro’s 17 (“Puorro”) motion to dismiss and joinder to his co-defendants’ respective motions (Dkt. 18 45), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motion 19 to compel arbitration (Dkt. 54) (collectively, “defendants”). 20 Having read…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.