Chung
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH 7 Plaintiffs,
8 v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION, STAY THE CASE,
9 WILSON CHUNG, et al., AND DISMISS 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 41, 43, 45, 47, 54, 57, 11 80
12 Before the court are defendant Jedd Williams’ (“Williams”) motion to compel 13 arbitration and stay the case or, in the alternative, motion to dismiss (Dkt. 41), defendant 14 Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motions (Dkt. 15 43), defendant Plantronic Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 40) and 16 joinder to Williams’ and Chung’s motions (Dkt. 47), defendant Thomas Puorro’s 17 (“Puorro”) motion to dismiss and joinder to his co-defendants’ respective motions (Dkt. 18 45), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss and joinder to Williams’ motion 19 to compel arbitration (Dkt. 54) (collectively, “defendants”). 20 Having read…