Sorian

Sorian v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20204:19-cv-00445California9,376 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAULINE ANTOINETTE SORIAN1, Case No. 19-cv-00445-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 22 Defendant. 11

12 13 Plaintiff Pauline Antoinette Soria (“Plaintiff” or “Soria”) moves for summary judgment to 14 reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final 15 administrative decision, which found Soria not disabled and therefore denied her application for 16 benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. The Commissioner 17 cross-moves to affirm. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS Soria’s motion in part, 18 denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remands this case for further proceedings. 19 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 20 Soria alleges disability beginning on December 11, 2013.2 AR 160. On October 6, 2014,3 21 Soria filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, which was initially 22 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.