Sorian

Sorian v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20204:19-cv-00445California9,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAULINE ANTOINETTE SORIAN1, Case No. 19-cv-00445-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 22 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Pauline Antoinette Soria (“Plaintiff” or “Soria”) moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Soria not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS Soria’s motion in part, denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remands this case for further proceedings. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Soria alleges disability beginning on December 11, 2013. AR 160. On October 6, 2014,3 Soria filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, which was initially 22 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.