Connor, M.D. v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20204:19-cv-06552California462 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CAROLINE L. CONNOR, M.D., Case No. 19-cv-06552-YGR (TSH)

8 Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 31 10 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

OF AMERICA,

11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Caroline Connor has sued Unum for disability benefits she says she is owed under 14 an ERISA plan. ECF No. 1. The core issue in dispute is whether she was a full-time employee 15 entitled to the benefits. Id. The parties now have a dispute over the application of the attorney- 16 client privilege to certain documents that Unum has refused to produce. ECF No. 31. 17 There are really two sets of documents at issue. First, there are legal communications prior 18 to 2019 with Paul Revere, a corporate affiliate of Unum’s, concerning Connor’s prior individual 19 disability claim. The parties make complicated privilege arguments concerning these documents. 20 However, the Court finds those privilege arguments unnecessary to resolve because, having done 21 an in camera review, it concludes these documents are completely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.