Woo

Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20203:19-cv-07042California7,020 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TONY WOO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07042-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND;

INC., CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant American Honda Motor Co.'s ("Honda") Motion, filed February 27, 2020, "to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs Tony Woo ("Woo"), Daniel Rifkin ("Rifkin"), and Douglas P. Schwert ("Schwert") have filed opposition, to which Honda has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In the operative complaint, the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), plaintiffs allege that Rifkin, on or about April 6,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.