Woo
Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TONY WOO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07042-MMC
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING
10 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND;
INC., CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
11 CONFERENCE Defendant.
12 13 Before the Court is defendant American Honda Motor Co.'s ("Honda") Motion, filed 14 February 27, 2020, "to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs 15 Tony Woo ("Woo"), Daniel Rifkin ("Rifkin"), and Douglas P. Schwert ("Schwert") have 16 filed opposition, to which Honda has replied. Having read and considered the papers 17 filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 18 BACKGROUND 19 In the operative complaint, the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), plaintiffs allege 20 that Rifkin, on or about April 6,…